Doesn't strike me as an AN type striker but we shall see
Posted By: loz on January 1st 2016 at 11:28:18
Message Thread
- "leading candidates" to take Bamford (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Jan 1, 11:12:01
- Would he start ahead of Mbok, Jerome or Grabban as lone striker? (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 1, 15:22:25
- Good player, just can't see where he'd fit in (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Jan 1, 13:19:17
- Good player but I'd rather Pritchard (NCFC) - mr chimp, Jan 1, 12:36:59
- Quality, desire and good attitude. But if he wants to start games needs to go back into Champs (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Jan 1, 12:01:31
- Is he actually any good? In mean not one start for Phallus... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Jan 1, 11:50:24
- Pardiola said he wasn't physical enough. (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 1, 11:51:38
- Physical in the Olivia Neutron Bomb way or physically fit... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Jan 1, 11:54:35
- Probably both, he's quite a small lad (coming from me, I know) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 1, 11:57:17
- Are you a dwarf ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 1, 14:13:47
- Probably both, he's quite a small lad (coming from me, I know) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 1, 11:57:17
- Physical in the Olivia Neutron Bomb way or physically fit... (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Jan 1, 11:54:35
- Pardiola said he wasn't physical enough. (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 1, 11:51:38
- Depends on his attitude I guess, though I'm sure a wave of the curly finger would sort him (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Jan 1, 11:46:09
- I really don't want too much upheaval in this window (NCFC) - Jim, Jan 1, 11:44:46
- Ha-ha. Now Jim's concerned about too many options. Sometimes, you just can't win (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Jan 1, 12:35:24
- Bamford has got unfeasibly white teeth though. For that reason, I'm with Jim (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Jan 1, 12:40:57
- Ha-ha. Now Jim's concerned about too many options. Sometimes, you just can't win (n/m) (NCFC) - Higher Wrather, Jan 1, 12:35:24
- i think he will end up at Bournemouth. Think we have better already (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Jan 1, 11:37:21
- Doesn't strike me as an AN type striker but we shall see (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Jan 1, 11:28:18
- Yep I did say it could be on (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 1, 11:27:10
- No chance. His aspirations are higher. (n/m) (NCFC) - Mark Barham, Jan 1, 12:41:35
- Not sure I'd want him. (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, Jan 1, 11:20:48
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.