Re. New Pinto. If true I would not rule out signing a new goalkeeper...

If it is true that we are in for a new right back then I think it is likely that we are also in for a new goal keeper.
AN yesterday said that we should have got more points form the games that we have played so far. Should have meaning that we should have had it not been for individual errors.
Maybe he has realised Whittaker is not up to it, neither is Martin. If he is prepared to replace Martin then a new goalkeeper is likely.

Posted By: jimbo on December 29th 2015 at 10:49:11

Message Thread

Re. New Pinto. If true I would not rule out signing a new goalkeeper... (NCFC) - jimbo, Dec 29, 10:49:11
- He's already bedded in Rudd.... Why replace him when he's doing really welk (NCFC) - hoolahan, Dec 29, 10:54:17
  - That TheoClitorus looked handy (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Dec 29, 14:14:15
  - Ha (n/m) (NCFC) - yellowman, Dec 29, 11:55:05
  - He is doing welk but looks a little short on mussel (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 29, 11:01:13
    - Just clam up, will you? (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Dec 29, 11:15:53
      - Cock (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 29, 11:18:27
        
        Must you be so shellfish? Old crust (NCFC) - APB, Dec 29, 11:21:49
        
        I'll winkle a laugh out of you yet (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Dec 29, 11:24:01
  - What a prawn (n/m) (NCFC) - Dandy Highburyman, Dec 29, 11:01:12
- ... (NCFC) - harry boulders, Dec 29, 10:54:12
- Ruddy has already been replaced, Martin has not. (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Dec 29, 10:51:50
- Sorry should be new right back. Not Pinto. (n/m) (NCFC) - jimbo, Dec 29, 10:50:37

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.