Not really, if Wigan offered about 6.5 in the summer ...
... I'd hardly consider 7.5 million silly. So, the difference between unacceptable and silly is Hughes+Etuhu?
Posted By: bjt on January 22nd 2006 at 11:16:17
Message Thread
- Of the ?7M (NCFC) - ncJamie, Jan 22, 11:05:38
- we had better bloody spend it on new players. (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Jan 22, 11:14:36
- There is no way it's 7mill up front... (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 22, 11:06:10
- 50% of the basic fee is received on the day of the transfer the same if we buy someone (NCFC) - Financebod, Jan 22, 11:11:26
- But we would never pay all the ?'s up front for new players anyway... (NCFC) - Derek Acorah, Jan 22, 11:09:21
- WTF happened to "silly money" - Worthless talks out of his arse shocker ... n/m (n/m) (NCFC) - bjt, Jan 22, 11:09:05
- You don't think ?7.25m is "silly" money for a Championship player? (n/m) (NCFC) - theguru, Jan 22, 11:13:17
- Not really, if Wigan offered about 6.5 in the summer ... (NCFC) - bjt, Jan 22, 11:16:17
- But in the summer we weren't a mediocre mid-table team. (NCFC) - theguru, Jan 22, 11:17:39
- I think I probably would label Hughes and Etuhu (NCFC) - Iwan Husarmi, Jan 22, 11:17:18
- lol ... n/m (n/m) (NCFC) - bjt, Jan 22, 11:19:51
- Not really, if Wigan offered about 6.5 in the summer ... (NCFC) - bjt, Jan 22, 11:16:17
- You don't think ?7.25m is "silly" money for a Championship player? (n/m) (NCFC) - theguru, Jan 22, 11:13:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.