Jarvis is much better than Rivers was. As much as I enjoyed watching the latter play - Wrath of the Barclay

Jarvis is much better than Rivers was. As much as I enjoyed watching the latter play

Steeno was also a legend in his time at full back though

Posted By: essexcanaryOTBC on October 18th 2015 at 14:14:38

Message Thread

Really not getting the Brady at left back ahead of Olsson stuff (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 18, 10:17:05
- Same (NCFC) - wolfio, Oct 18, 12:02:36
  - Jarvis is much better than Rivers was. As much as I enjoyed watching the latter play (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 18, 14:14:38
- Trust in Neil surely? (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Oct 18, 10:21:26
  - Yes, but that doesn't mean things can't be discussed (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 18, 10:26:08
    - Indeed... (NCFC) - loz, Oct 18, 10:29:00
      - See I think Olsson is better going forward as a left back/link up play than Brady at left (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 18, 10:48:25
        
        Brady better than Jarvis for me but we are ... (NCFC) - loz, Oct 18, 10:52:36
- Conference standard. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, Oct 18, 10:18:01
  - Not sure if you're referring to Brady or Olsson but a ridiculous comment regardless (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 18, 10:24:27
    - I think it's something XXL called Brady early on in the season (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 18, 10:25:25
      - Oh, fair enough. Sorry. (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 18, 10:26:48
        
        That's ok. Don't think APB meant that you had said it ;) (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 18, 11:14:26
  - Wouldn't even make Stevenage/Daggenham's bench (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 18, 10:22:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.