Whatever he goes for, it'll very instructive as to how we'll approach the game

The Leicester fan in that blog down there was saying de Laet is a weak spot at RB, but Mahrez is clearly a threat at RW. So do we try to exploit the defensive frailty by playing Brady and Jarvis, or keep Olsson in to try to neutralise Mahrez? It's a tricky one, but given our wider defensive problems I'd be surprised if we leave out Olsson as our only proven LB.

Posted By: King on October 2nd 2015 at 16:32:25

Message Thread

So. Votes for left-hand side combination on Saturday then (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Oct 2, 14:09:08
- Whatever he goes for, it'll very instructive as to how we'll approach the game (NCFC) - King, Oct 2, 16:32:25
  - Having said all that, Olsson is more of a LWB anyway (NCFC) - King, Oct 2, 16:33:52
- SAN said the foxes play a 4-2-4 system sometimes (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Oct 2, 14:55:50
- thought about this yesterday (NCFC) - Brandonio, Oct 2, 14:54:22
- Brady and Jarvis for me - by no means set in stone for the season though (NCFC) - Old Man, Oct 2, 14:33:56
- Would like to squeeze the boy Jarvo in there. (n/m) (NCFC) - bird table, Oct 2, 14:31:16
- Need Olsson at FB cos he's a FB! Then probably Jarvis and Brady (NCFC) - admckechnie, Oct 2, 14:24:13
- Definitely Brady and Jarvis at the moment (n/m) (NCFC) - MaxsHandler, Oct 2, 14:19:49
- I'd play all 3 as you suggest... (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Oct 2, 14:18:41
  - I agree, all three with redders off the bench again for final goal. (n/m) (NCFC) - Basingstoke_Canary, Oct 2, 16:45:05
- Brady and Jarvis. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Oct 2, 14:17:05
  - This (n/m) (NCFC) - Hulk Rules, Oct 2, 14:20:02
- tough on Brady, but think I would go MO and Jarvis (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Oct 2, 14:15:06

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.