It's a ?500k + car

Being driven at 94mph (according to the official report) in a 45mph zone.

I can't see why Porsche are responsible at all.

The seatbelt causing injuries that prevented his escape is clearly what they're relying on, but objectively that sounds unlikely and also if they cannot prove that the speed involved was significantly lower than the official report states, I can't see that there's a case to answer. I can't see porsche settling out of court here.

Is this just more jumping on the back of anti-VW sentiment hoping they're keen to stay out of the limelight?

Posted By: SimonOTBC on September 29th 2015 at 11:35:42

Message Thread

Seriously? (General Chat) - SimonOTBC, Sep 29, 08:44:25
- American Blame and Suing culture I'm afraid. (General Chat) - Cheltenham_Canary, Sep 29, 08:56:06
  - I'm surprised she isn't suing the Lamppost manufacturer too. (n/m) (General Chat) - Trent_Canary, Sep 29, 09:47:09
    - The sad thing is that as she's so young someone must be giving her terrible advice (General Chat) - SimonOTBC, Sep 29, 10:30:07
      - only terrible advice if she doesnt get a payout (General Chat) - CWC, Sep 29, 10:43:11
        
        It's a ?500k + car (General Chat) - SimonOTBC, Sep 29, 11:35:42
        
        where cost of settlement < cost of litigating => payout (General Chat) - CWC, Sep 29, 12:44:04
        
        Absolutely true (General Chat) - SimonOTBC, Sep 29, 13:09:27
        
        It was also at least 7 years old given they stopped making them in 2007 (n/m) (General Chat) - SimonOTBC, Sep 29, 11:41:11
  - TVR and Caterham (amongst others) wouldn't stand a chance (General Chat) - SimonOTBC, Sep 29, 09:19:59
    - The lack of safety features in my TVR saved my life (General Chat) - bjg123, Sep 29, 09:52:04

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.