Whenever we don't have Wes we create far fewer chances

That means the opposition can spend less time worrying about us and less time defending, and more time battering on our door

I really think that it's a mistake dropping Wes on the basis that it makes us tighter defensively. It just has the effect of inviting teams onto us. But what do I know.

Posted By: Old Git on September 21st 2015 at 11:49:54

Message Thread

Watching the highlights back (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 21, 11:46:24
- Was our 2nd poorest performance of the season (NCFC) - SCC 28, Sep 21, 12:03:42
  - Against Southampton and Liverpool though (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 21, 12:06:57
- Jarvis won us the corner that we scored from (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 21, 11:56:59
  - Brady's corners are fantastic!! (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 21, 12:29:49
    - VMT. Also liking the way he tells penalty box prima donna divers what he thinks. (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Sep 21, 21:26:30
- Whenever we don't have Wes we create far fewer chances (NCFC) - Old Git, Sep 21, 11:49:54
  - I have been a critic over the years but wes has upped his game and I agree (NCFC) - Men without hats, Sep 21, 12:13:56
- Whittaker has been way better than wisdom tbf... (NCFC) - loz, Sep 21, 11:47:39
  - Wisdom second half against Bournemouth was massively superior to Whit (n/m) (NCFC) - Jim, Sep 21, 13:29:46

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.