??? so getting rid of RvW and Hooper...........
and getting in a player who can actually play the lone striker position that AN wants is weaker......Hmmmm
Posted By: usacanary on September 1st 2015 at 15:26:28
Message Thread
- Hooper having medical at fulham ffs were going to be weaker than we started (n/m) (NCFC) - eddie, Sep 1, 15:24:10
- lol (n/m) (NCFC) - yellows2011, Sep 1, 15:26:46
- ??? so getting rid of RvW and Hooper........... (NCFC) - usacanary, Sep 1, 15:26:28
- Ok so what if he gets injured were a striker short ? (n/m) (NCFC) - eddie, Sep 1, 15:27:17
- The old "what if" (NCFC) - usacanary, Sep 1, 15:29:43
- Ok so what if he gets injured were a striker short ? (n/m) (NCFC) - eddie, Sep 1, 15:27:17
- Why can't they see this at the club, eddie? Why??!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Sep 1, 15:25:49
- He is an overweight commuter who's never made himself integral (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Sep 1, 15:25:29
- Grabban staying put. Swap with Muff for CD rejected......so (NCFC) - Basingstoke_Canary, Sep 1, 15:29:46
- Even so still leaves us a striker short (n/m) (NCFC) - eddie, Sep 1, 15:26:38
- Loza-time (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Sep 1, 15:28:45
- Ateratively it may mean things are starting to move (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Sep 1, 15:25:07
- Exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Sep 1, 15:26:43
- Well yes but we nedd to get somethong moving fast then (n/m) (NCFC) - eddie, Sep 1, 15:25:52
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.