Not sure you've really proved the point there
Watford 30 odd million
Bournemouth 20
us 10
I do think we,be needed to move pepole though not because of net spend but for wage bill
Would think few hooper and lafferty are all hugh earners as was Turner and darth Bader
That's a lot of high earners not playing and hard to shift
Posted By: matgore on August 28th 2015 at 10:44:59
Message Thread
- Net spend chart (NCFC) - King, Aug 28, 10:33:15
- Yep, thats why I didnt get Lamberts Rant.... Villa only spent 7 million net (NCFC) - usacanary, Aug 28, 15:14:48
- Doesn't take wages etc into account, just headline transfer fees (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Aug 28, 10:58:01
- Not sure you've really proved the point there (NCFC) - matgore, Aug 28, 10:44:59
- Only team below us in that chart that will be our relegation rivals is (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Aug 28, 10:44:50
- Don't think that chart is that significant (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 28, 10:41:07
- Watford and palace have both spent a foo quid (n/m) (NCFC) - manc_yello, Aug 28, 10:38:37
- ... (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 28, 10:37:17
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.