Perhaps a dumb question but oh well

Is there any reason why you have to have a squad of 25?
Since money and wages will always be a problem, why not have just a squad of 18-20 to hold down the costs? Wouldn't it be better to raise wages for 18 than water them down for 25? Could always use younger players for practice purposes if that is an issue. What makes 25 sacred?

Posted By: SeattleSounders on August 13th 2015 at 19:33:46

Message Thread

Perhaps a dumb question but oh well (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Aug 13, 19:33:46
- If you start with 25 (NCFC) - Old Man, Aug 13, 19:52:58
  - 9 (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Aug 13, 20:10:04
- I suppose it hinders the richer clubs buying enormous squads (NCFC) - APB, Aug 13, 19:37:59
  - Maybe that's what we were trying to do with Leeds (and Becchio in particular) (n/m) (NCFC) - essexcanaryOTBC, Aug 13, 20:10:53
  - Chelski have (had) 72 contracted players (NCFC) - Ralf Scrampton, Aug 13, 19:55:52
  - My question though is about having a smaller squad and (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, Aug 13, 19:42:42
    - You don't have to have 25, think that the min is something like 15. (n/m) (NCFC) - Jacksons_Twelfth, Aug 13, 20:05:14

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.