Hope not as we don't need two
Too much focus on strikers and not enough on defence.
Posted By: Jim on August 11th 2015 at 12:43:24
Message Thread
- What's the chances of getting two strikers in? (NCFC) - harry boulders, Aug 11, 12:35:10
- Hope not as we don't need two (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 11, 12:43:24
- What if we get a striker and another striker who can also play as a defender, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Aug 11, 13:24:36
- Or the Doc. (NCFC) - bird table, Aug 11, 13:36:34
- Tbf we don't know focus isn't just as strong on defence... (NCFC) - loz, Aug 11, 12:59:15
- No we don't and I can't imagine that it isn't (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Aug 11, 13:21:07
- Known unknowns. (n/m) (NCFC) - bird table, Aug 11, 13:03:27
- Amen (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Aug 11, 12:51:16
- Agree 100%. (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Aug 11, 12:49:53
- VMT (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 11, 12:47:02
- What if we get a striker and another striker who can also play as a defender, (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Aug 11, 13:24:36
- 9 (n/m) (NCFC) - Kangol Canary, Aug 11, 12:39:24
- Possible if RvW, hoops and Lafferty all leave (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Aug 11, 12:38:14
- Hope not as we don't need two (NCFC) - Jim, Aug 11, 12:43:24
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.