Signings ?
Why is everyone so against signing Calum Davenport ? I thought he was pretty good.
Personally, I'd really really like to see us got for Michael Brown and McSheffrey. We might still make the play-offs with that line-up and it would signal to Ashton and the suppoerters that we would be in contention next season.
It makes sense as the lost season ticket sales which will happen if no investment is made would probably pay for one if not both of them.
Posted By: matgore on January 13th 2006 at 12:14:35
Message Thread
- Signings ? (NCFC) - matgore, Jan 13, 12:14:35
- but no better than Shacks (n/m) (NCFC) - green tambourine, Jan 13, 12:34:33
- He is... (NCFC) - Barmy acronym, Jan 13, 12:37:40
- Disagree with that (NCFC) - Swanny, Jan 13, 13:31:28
- He is... (NCFC) - Barmy acronym, Jan 13, 12:37:40
- Wasn't that good (NCFC) - inutero, Jan 13, 12:21:27
- Oh how times change... (NCFC) - theguru, Jan 13, 12:29:40
- He was a good player but he showed up failings in the rest of the team (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 13, 12:42:30
- Oh how times change... (NCFC) - theguru, Jan 13, 12:29:40
- but no better than Shacks (n/m) (NCFC) - green tambourine, Jan 13, 12:34:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.