McVeigh is surplus to requirements isn't he?

Posted By: pants on January 13th 2006 at 11:26:38

Message Thread

I've got to say im sick to the back teeth of people, when (NCFC) - Bonjour, Jan 13, 11:15:05
- well said. (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Jan 13, 14:36:39
- McVeigh is surplus to requirements isn't he? (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 13, 11:26:38
  - well he is suspended for sat so id say he is for then... (NCFC) - Bonjour, Jan 13, 11:29:03
    - Do you think that the club should not offer McVeigh a new contract? (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 13, 11:36:40
    - oh, so previous shouldn't count for McVeigh? (NCFC) - pants, Jan 13, 11:35:00
      - of course i think mcveigh should be offered a deal (NCFC) - Bonjour, Jan 13, 11:44:26
        
        doesn't do it for 90 minutes, game in game out, every season (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Jan 13, 14:37:47
- Too be fair... (NCFC) - Barmy acronym, Jan 13, 11:19:23
  - To not too (n/m) (NCFC) - Swanny, Jan 13, 14:01:43
  - i think ashton is, some of the flicks etc he does (NCFC) - Bonjour, Jan 13, 11:22:08
  - Did you never see that collection of goals vid Crewe had on their site when they sold him? (n/m) (NCFC) - Halved Ten Loins, Jan 13, 11:21:09
    - Nope (n/m) (NCFC) - Barmy acronym, Jan 13, 11:23:33
      - So well smart flicks and tricks in the penalty areas (n/m) (NCFC) - Halved Ten Loins, Jan 13, 11:24:30
- what's that all about, who keeps going on about Jason Koumas? (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 13, 11:18:52
  - Bonjour (n/m) (NCFC) - Halved Ten Loins, Jan 13, 11:19:19
- Blub of the day! (n/m) (NCFC) - conker, Jan 13, 11:16:56

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.