I suppose partly because we created little
But they saw that hoofing it at Martin yields results.
In their minds, they probably think it will be more of the same next weekend.
I hope we put a more fluent display in, but they just are good at disrupting their opponents.
Posted By: SimonOTBC on May 12th 2015 at 07:22:20
Message Thread
- Scum (NCFC) - Windowlicker1, May 12, 07:01:24
- I suppose partly because we created little (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, May 12, 07:22:20
- Got to win the second balls against hoofers, BJ may beed to plat abit derper for a while t (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, May 12, 07:34:39
- Agree but would you stick r Bennett or turner in? (NCFC) - Windowlicker1, May 12, 07:59:32
- Nope. (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, May 12, 08:48:53
- I haven't seen enough of us this season to make that call tbf. (n/m) (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, May 12, 08:28:35
- Yeah - I think that's why we need wes too. (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, May 12, 07:53:26
- Agree but would you stick r Bennett or turner in? (NCFC) - Windowlicker1, May 12, 07:59:32
- Got to win the second balls against hoofers, BJ may beed to plat abit derper for a while t (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, May 12, 07:34:39
- Both t (n/m) (NCFC) - DickyVonStinkhorn, May 12, 07:09:33
- defeats were 1945 kick offs too and this is lunch time (n/m) (NCFC) - DickyVonStinkhorn, May 12, 07:11:24
- I suppose partly because we created little (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, May 12, 07:22:20
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.