I read the article

And the report.

Isn't the suggestion in the report capping the consumption of the fund on a per person basis? Therefore potentially spreading it's use more fairly across a greater number of people? Also, I didn't see anything to say that the total spend would be capped.

Plus is it actually being implemented? I thought it was only one option of several that is documented.

I'm probably missing something though.

Posted By: SimonOTBC on May 8th 2015 at 19:17:49

Message Thread

It starts on the same day. Congratulations Britain, you wanted this (General Chat) - pants, May 8, 18:38:09
- Snuck it under the radar. (n/m) (General Chat) - protheroe fitzgibbon, May 8, 19:00:01
- Wow a Tory pledge broken already (n/m) (General Chat) - Larry Hagman, May 8, 18:57:42
  - as the nation falls apart in the avalanche (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, May 8, 19:00:46
  - Is it? (General Chat) - SimonOTBC, May 8, 19:00:40
    - Tories said they would help "...hundreds of thousands more disabled people who can (General Chat) - Larry Hagman, May 8, 19:07:49
      - I read the article (General Chat) - SimonOTBC, May 8, 19:17:49
- and so it starts, disgusting party. (n/m) (General Chat) - DrDublin, May 8, 18:48:34
- FFS give it a rest (General Chat) - Old Splat, May 8, 18:42:55
  - I'm ok with angry about disgusting actions (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, May 8, 18:44:03
- Surely though, you only need to spend once to help each person? (General Chat) - SimonOTBC, May 8, 18:42:40
- Nice (General Chat) - CB41, May 8, 18:40:06

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.