of course, I just the commentators were over playing the importance

of Bamford's injury. It was their pressing in midfield, giving us absolutely no time, which really caused us problems in the opening 20 minutes. Once they dropped the intensity a bit, we started to dominate possession and get into the game.

Posted By: Mecagoenti on April 17th 2015 at 20:45:11

Message Thread

Be fair if their no. 23 not injured the ankle, we will be concede more goals now! (NCFC) - XXL16, Apr 17, 20:38:50
- I think it's just a coincidence that Bamford got injured at the same tame as we (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 17, 20:41:16
  - totally agree (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 17, 20:44:20
  - but we were never going to sustain our shiteness either (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 17, 20:43:24
    - of course, I just the commentators were over playing the importance (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 17, 20:45:11
      - but their confidence must have dropped massively (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 17, 20:46:43
      - Yep (n/m) (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, Apr 17, 20:45:37
  - Vmt (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 17, 20:42:58
- Bollocks (n/m) (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 17, 20:41:06

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.