Boro have the best defence in the league, but offset by them
having to win, so they could be more open than usual.
But if I was a bookie, I'd make Watford slight favourites based on them scoring more goals than us even if we both win all three.
Can't see Bournemouth dropping another point unless they crumble under the pressure.
Will be ridiculous to win 8 in a row and not go up, but very possible.
Posted By: duke of york on April 16th 2015 at 10:44:35
Message Thread
- Will we finish in the top 2 yes or no? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 10:13:39
- Yes - Champions - confirmed in the last 10 minutes of the season (NCFC) - Kev, Apr 16, 16:43:09
- Yes! (n/m) (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, Apr 16, 12:42:58
- Yes, bournmouth to fuck it up (n/m) (NCFC) - strap_on sally, Apr 16, 11:25:18
- I reckon that they could. Might well be us, Watford + 1 other. (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Apr 16, 13:59:08
- Oops, I meant Bournemouth. NOT Watford. (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Apr 16, 14:00:15
- Watford have loads of loan players, I know. (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Apr 16, 14:04:38
- Oops, I meant Bournemouth. NOT Watford. (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Apr 16, 14:00:15
- I reckon that they could. Might well be us, Watford + 1 other. (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Apr 16, 13:59:08
- no (n/m) (NCFC) - earlydoors, Apr 16, 11:08:00
- JA! (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Apr 16, 11:00:04
- No (NCFC) - Dunney, Apr 16, 10:56:57
- No (NCFC) - SimonOTBC, Apr 16, 10:56:01
- No . (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Apr 16, 10:52:07
- No - on goal difference/scored. (NCFC) - CWC, Apr 16, 10:46:32
- Yes (n/m) (NCFC) - Ken Dodds Dads Dog, Apr 16, 10:46:09
- *tosses a coin* (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Apr 16, 10:44:04
- will you accept aye as my answer? (NCFC) - ingi, Apr 16, 10:42:53
- Yes, after dishing out the ultimate payback on the Fulhams (n/m) (NCFC) - I Am Hoot, Apr 16, 10:36:49
- No (n/m) (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Apr 16, 10:36:32
- No. Even though we will finally beat Fulham. (n/m) (NCFC) - pab, Apr 16, 10:33:15
- What are the bookies' odds saying now? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 16, 10:32:14
- It's similar (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 10:35:14
- Although Ladbrokes actually have Watford (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 10:37:06
- Shorter at 5/6 and us 10/11 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 10:37:59
- Right. Now no obvious reason why we should be shorter odds than them, is there? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 16, 10:45:10
- Shorter at 5:6 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 10:37:20
- Shorter at 5/6 and us 10/11 (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 10:37:59
- Although Ladbrokes actually have Watford (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 10:37:06
- It's similar (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 10:35:14
- Yes (n/m) (NCFC) - malkybarkid, Apr 16, 10:28:55
- Yes (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Apr 16, 10:25:29
- The run-ins suggest no (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 10:24:39
- Agreed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 10:33:02
- Boro have the best defence in the league, but offset by them (NCFC) - duke of york, Apr 16, 10:44:35
- Agreed (NCFC) - SCC 28, Apr 16, 10:33:02
- Much as I'd enjoy a trip to Wembley, I really hope it won't be necessary! (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Apr 16, 10:23:34
- Can I answer on Saturday around 5pm? (n/m) (NCFC) - Darren Eadie, Apr 16, 10:22:43
- Given my Jim-esque instincts, no. (n/m) (NCFC) - bird table, Apr 16, 10:22:16
- No (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Apr 16, 10:21:43
- Yes (n/m) (NCFC) - emmaroyds, Apr 16, 10:19:56
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.