That's probably not very boozy lager is it? 3.4%, 3.5%? Sounds about right.

More like 180+ cals in a premium strength beer.

Even more in very malty beers like Guinness, since there's more unfermented sugar, as well as the alcohol.

Posted By: Arizona Bay on April 7th 2015 at 11:44:14

Message Thread

Sainsburys 440ml Lager, says it's 115 cals a can (General Chat) - pants, Apr 7, 11:37:20
- is that more or fewer than you would have expected? (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 7, 11:50:27
  - Well I was pretty surprised. I've always assume a pint of something (General Chat) - pants, Apr 7, 12:06:43
    - In beer it's nearly all relative to the alcohol content isn't it? (General Chat) - Mecagoenti, Apr 7, 12:20:34
- That's probably not very boozy lager is it? 3.4%, 3.5%? Sounds about right. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Apr 7, 11:44:14
  - 3.8 I think (n/m) (General Chat) - pants, Apr 7, 11:45:04
  - Dunno, think Guinness is better, calorie-wise. Just. (n/m) (General Chat) - Yellalee, Apr 7, 11:45:04
    - 210 cals for a pint (568ml), I've just found on the internet. (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Apr 7, 11:49:12
      - This is why I'm looking forward to it being on the cans (General Chat) - pants, Apr 7, 11:57:22
        
        ah, so 115 is a bit fewer? (n/m) (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 7, 11:58:39
      - es (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, Apr 7, 11:49:47
        
        Guinnae? (n/m) (General Chat) - Wilts, Apr 7, 12:08:07
    - I think in the next few months all alcohol is going to state the kcals (General Chat) - pants, Apr 7, 11:47:21
- Dunno, I've never eaten a can. (n/m) (General Chat) - harry boulders, Apr 7, 11:42:54

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.