Yes, that too
My point is that it's entirely possible to have an argument on the broad split between cuts, borrowing and taxes, certainly with some kind of indicative detail but without the ridiculous assumption that it's reasonable to predict the global economy, in which we are but bit part players, even two years out let alone five.
Posted By: Old Man on April 2nd 2015 at 23:35:52
Message Thread
- One slightly depressing thing about that debate - (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, Apr 2, 22:22:26
- The other thing is that it's easy to agree with spending... (General Chat) - pieman63, Apr 2, 22:49:44
- None of the opposition parties have actually said how they would do what (General Chat) - Jim, Apr 2, 23:01:11
- No - nor have the Tories (General Chat) - Old Man, Apr 2, 23:06:07
- you talk about higher borrowing, why not higher taxes? (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 2, 23:32:38
- Yes, that too (General Chat) - Old Man, Apr 2, 23:35:52
- you talk about higher borrowing, why not higher taxes? (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, Apr 2, 23:32:38
- No - nor have the Tories (General Chat) - Old Man, Apr 2, 23:06:07
- None of the opposition parties have actually said how they would do what (General Chat) - Jim, Apr 2, 23:01:11
- There were many depressing things about that debate (General Chat) - Old Man, Apr 2, 22:41:11
- VMT (n/m) (General Chat) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Apr 2, 22:25:37
- The other thing is that it's easy to agree with spending... (General Chat) - pieman63, Apr 2, 22:49:44
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.