they has a midfielder playing up front, they showed no ambition, sadly we didnt attack the

game, first half we were pretty good, 2nd half we didnt start until we made the changes, sorry they were there for the taking despite dreadful goalkeeping that would have been irrelevant if we made changes earlier, in my opinion.

Posted By: lovely old job on March 14th 2015 at 18:59:56

Message Thread

The tactics today were poor, we done everything to late, they were negative we didnt sieze (NCFC) - lovely old job, Mar 14, 18:41:46
- Hooper always seems to fade. Redmond completely (NCFC) - dennis moore, Mar 14, 19:30:10
- *did* (n/m) (NCFC) - CB41, Mar 14, 19:21:59
  - ?? (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Mar 14, 19:23:25
- Can't agree I thought the tactics worked v well... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 14, 18:54:48
  - they has a midfielder playing up front, they showed no ambition, sadly we didnt attack the (NCFC) - lovely old job, Mar 14, 18:59:56
    - can't disagree (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 14, 19:00:38
      - they made 2 defensive changes in the last 20 minutes, it was crying out for Redmond, (NCFC) - lovely old job, Mar 14, 19:03:32
- agree. the team was set up to boss possession (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Mar 14, 18:46:04

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.