no-one will pay ?2m for Hucks
even WE didn't when he was a really hot property and the Board were under enormous pressure to splash out on him. He isn't hot property any more. Was very average in the Prem and has been less-than-stellar in the Fizzy Pop this season. And he buggers up your team formation. Hence there haven't even been any rumours of any bids.
Posted By: mr carra on January 6th 2006 at 09:47:37
Message Thread
- Someone comes in for say Green and Hucks... (NCFC) - Derek_Achora, Jan 6, 09:23:52
- Why Davenport? (NCFC) - Waghorns brown nose, Jan 6, 09:47:40
- no-one will pay ?2m for Hucks (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 6, 09:47:37
- Average (NCFC) - Waghorns brown nose, Jan 6, 10:01:24
- actually Francis was far and away our best player (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 6, 10:10:33
- ! (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 6, 10:23:05
- You could count Hucks' genuinely good games.. (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 6, 10:29:40
- I think I'm on a loser having a debate about Huckerby with you anyway, so I'm not going to (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 6, 10:32:30
- francis was good look how well our midfield is doing without him!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 6, 10:28:21
- You could count Hucks' genuinely good games.. (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 6, 10:29:40
- ! (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 6, 10:23:05
- actually Francis was far and away our best player (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 6, 10:10:33
- Average (NCFC) - Waghorns brown nose, Jan 6, 10:01:24
- Last thing I want is Hux to go (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Jan 6, 09:44:40
- wouldn't be the end of the world IMO (NCFC) - Canaria_glorificus, Jan 6, 09:54:11
- still the best player we have (NCFC) - pants, Jan 6, 10:01:16
- Huckerby is equally redundant while we're playing hoofball (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 6, 10:16:04
- True (NCFC) - Canaria_glorificus, Jan 6, 10:08:57
- with a new man in charge maybe he will play better:-) (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 6, 10:10:39
- still the best player we have (NCFC) - pants, Jan 6, 10:01:16
- wouldn't be the end of the world IMO (NCFC) - Canaria_glorificus, Jan 6, 09:54:11
- No... (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Jan 6, 09:41:53
- Why? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 6, 09:43:40
- Trust me... (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Jan 6, 09:54:53
- Ah... (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 6, 10:00:38
- You may as well post it (NCFC) - Canaria_glorificus, Jan 6, 10:13:09
- Is this a job for the distribution lists ? (NCFC) - Arganth, Jan 6, 10:01:46
- I'm no longer at my old establishment either...... (NCFC) - BeverlyHills0201, Jan 6, 10:15:09
- Sounds very interesting... (NCFC) - Dr Baker, Jan 6, 10:05:43
- Secret stuff... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Jan 6, 10:14:57
- Can't you vouch for me? (NCFC) - Dr Baker, Jan 6, 10:16:17
- Secret stuff... (NCFC) - Fierce Panda, Jan 6, 10:14:57
- Ah... (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 6, 10:00:38
- Trust me... (NCFC) - Jim Nasium, Jan 6, 09:54:53
- Why? (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 6, 09:43:40
- What & play Jerome in goal with Commons as left back & Davenport up front (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 6, 09:25:22
- Obviously... (NCFC) - Derek_Achora, Jan 6, 09:28:09
- I new what you meant really, I wouldn't want Hucks to go but Greeno deserves a chance to (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 6, 09:33:35
- Obviously... (NCFC) - Derek_Achora, Jan 6, 09:28:09
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.