If ball had gone for 4 they wouldn't have given the boundary - Wrath of the Barclay

If ball had gone for 4 they wouldn't have given the boundary

As has been seen in other examples

Posted By: Tony Martin on February 14th 2015 at 11:18:25

Message Thread

That's a cock up. Ball is 100% dead after being given out (Other Sports) - Tony Martin, Feb 14, 11:00:22
- If ball had gone for 4 they wouldn't have given the boundary (Other Sports) - Tony Martin, Feb 14, 11:18:25
- But does it become live again because the decision was overturned, hence batsman wasnt out (n/m) (Other Sports) - wobbly, Feb 14, 11:02:16
  - What happened? (n/m) (Other Sports) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 14, 11:34:14
    - You haven't got a clue (n/m) (Other Sports) - SCC 28, Feb 14, 12:04:59
      - You ok hun? (n/m) (Other Sports) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Feb 14, 12:17:22
  - Nope. First instinct for Anderson would not be to make his ground once Taylor given out (n/m) (Other Sports) - Tony Martin, Feb 14, 11:20:44
  - Nope. Proof here (Other Sports) - thebigfeller, Feb 14, 11:07:20
  - That is utter bollocks (n/m) (Other Sports) - Hulk Rules, Feb 14, 11:03:10

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.