I think for top 2 we basically have to go unbeaten for the rest of the season
which is not impossible if we hit form. But is also very unlikely based on how inconsistent we've been.
Posted By: Jim on February 9th 2015 at 15:56:10
Message Thread
- perceptions (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 9, 15:29:09
- we actually had the 4th highest points total after everyone had played 29 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 16:20:25
- the key difference is the position (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 9, 15:54:03
- funnily enough (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 9, 17:01:07
- we're actually 2 points worse off than 2001/02 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 17:06:11
- following season we were 2 points worse off after 29 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 17:12:31
- 01-02 was so freakish I am not comparing it (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 9, 17:11:16
- 92/93 conceded 3,7,4,3,3,3,3,5,3,3 and finished 3rd! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 17:15:34
- and did we get promoted that year? (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 9, 17:17:59
- Um. Cmon. Every Norwich fan should know what happened in 92/93. (n/m) (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 9, 17:19:15
- yeah to europe! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 17:18:31
- and did we get promoted that year? (n/m) (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 9, 17:17:59
- 92/93 conceded 3,7,4,3,3,3,3,5,3,3 and finished 3rd! (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 17:15:34
- I think the worse case scenario is (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 9, 17:03:42
- if we get to the play-offs (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 9, 17:08:26
- i'm sure everyone would agree with that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 17:10:11
- when Grabban's deflections (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 9, 17:17:43
- i'm sure everyone would agree with that (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 17:10:11
- if we get to the play-offs (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 9, 17:08:26
- we're actually 2 points worse off than 2001/02 (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 17:06:11
- I think for top 2 we basically have to go unbeaten for the rest of the season (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 9, 15:56:10
- funnily enough (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Feb 9, 17:01:07
- Well yes. So our record in 10/11 was exactly what Ipswich's is now (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 9, 15:47:37
- Our defensive problems have not been about shipping lots of goals but (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 9, 15:55:21
- Spot on (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 9, 16:33:12
- it's also been the opposite of under Lambert (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 9, 16:36:11
- Well, I think I'd rather concede fewer goals than more (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 9, 15:59:00
- you've created a straw man here (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 9, 16:14:33
- Fair point (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 9, 16:27:37
- all pretty much 5/2 to win it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 16:37:11
- what are our odds to finish top 2? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 9, 16:38:55
- sod all liquidity on that market (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 16:43:46
- top 3 are all around 4/6 to go up (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 16:44:28
- sounds about right (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 9, 17:28:07
- might just fancy derby and bournemouth from the run ins (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 17:34:31
- sounds about right (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 9, 17:28:07
- top 3 are all around 4/6 to go up (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 16:44:28
- sod all liquidity on that market (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 16:43:46
- what are our odds to finish top 2? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 9, 16:38:55
- I think it's far from over still (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Feb 9, 16:34:04
- yeah, afraid it looks that way (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 9, 16:33:37
- all pretty much 5/2 to win it (NCFC) - SCC 28, Feb 9, 16:37:11
- Fair point (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Feb 9, 16:27:37
- you've created a straw man here (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Feb 9, 16:14:33
- Spot on (NCFC) - duke of york, Feb 9, 16:33:12
- Our defensive problems have not been about shipping lots of goals but (NCFC) - Jim, Feb 9, 15:55:21
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.