not really
i think the fans were partly to blame for lacking patience and perspective.
But the manager should have stuck to his guns and carried on doing what he could do well, rather than trying to play more expansively.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on January 31st 2015 at 17:24:17
Message Thread
- At last a manager who recognises we need to keep clean sheets, defence has been (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 31, 17:07:00
- Yes (NCFC) - Kev, Jan 31, 17:18:56
- vmt - it all went wrong last season when (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 31, 17:11:15
- Are you saying that the fans were partly to blame for our demise (NCFC) - talbotsunbeamer, Jan 31, 17:20:45
- not really (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 31, 17:24:17
- Club's fault for hiring such a limited manager then and keeping him (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 31, 17:25:41
- not really (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Jan 31, 17:24:17
- THAT is an excellent point M. (n/m) (NCFC) - colincanary, Jan 31, 17:13:33
- It all went wrong when we replaced holt with Ricky (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 31, 17:12:49
- Holt would have been worse. Over the hill, a liability. (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Jan 31, 17:32:58
- Did great the season before (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 31, 17:40:31
- Holt would have been worse. Over the hill, a liability. (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Jan 31, 17:32:58
- Are you saying that the fans were partly to blame for our demise (NCFC) - talbotsunbeamer, Jan 31, 17:20:45
- Play your good strikers and goals may come (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 31, 17:10:06
- Yeah another Hughton - nice one!!! (n/m) (NCFC) - Thegelman, Jan 31, 17:07:54
- Yes, that's the real positive I'm drawing from today (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 31, 17:07:51
- Said Hoots (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 31, 17:07:41
- I dont mean it in a Hughton style, but its been obvious all season what the problem (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 31, 17:11:06
- Build from the back shouldn't mean playing without the best strikers (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 31, 17:13:10
- I couldn't agree more, that was a real shame, we probably would have won with them (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 31, 17:14:56
- hard to say really, Hooper hasn't really convinced as a lone striker (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 31, 17:27:32
- I couldn't agree more, that was a real shame, we probably would have won with them (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 31, 17:14:56
- Build from the back shouldn't mean playing without the best strikers (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 31, 17:13:10
- Haha. But seriously, this has been our main problem for the last several games. (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 31, 17:08:30
- Indeed so why drop the strikers who weren't a problem (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 31, 17:10:36
- I do agree that bit for me was strange, you need a partnership at the back, but we already (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 31, 17:12:04
- Indeed so why drop the strikers who weren't a problem (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 31, 17:10:36
- I dont mean it in a Hughton style, but its been obvious all season what the problem (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 31, 17:11:06
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.