Whittaker in midfield was bad.
But the formation in the first half was what really worried me... Looked like 4-1-2-2-1 at times. Maybe it was just me. If I'm right though, it would point to over elaborate management which is rarely a good thing in my experience. Keep it simple Alex.
Posted By: avenging canary on January 25th 2015 at 21:13:33
Message Thread
- Whittaker in midfield was bad. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Jan 25, 21:13:33
- Have to hope we'll loan a midfielder in this week (NCFC) - lurd, Jan 25, 21:36:28
- its supposed to be 4-3-3 which is really a 4-2-1-3. (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 25, 21:26:12
- No it wasn't. Was alway 1 up front. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Jan 25, 21:32:42
- you didnt think Lafferty was supposed to play Left wing then (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 25, 21:45:08
- That may we'll be what he was supposed to do. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Jan 25, 21:53:07
- this is what it is supposed to be but you are right, he had no idea (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 25, 22:12:43
- That's awful. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Jan 25, 22:16:23
- this is what it is supposed to be but you are right, he had no idea (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 25, 22:12:43
- That may we'll be what he was supposed to do. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Jan 25, 21:53:07
- you didnt think Lafferty was supposed to play Left wing then (NCFC) - thirsty work, Jan 25, 21:45:08
- No it wasn't. Was alway 1 up front. (NCFC) - avenging canary, Jan 25, 21:32:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.