Not going to read down the board. Does this cover what I'm missing?

Mike Phelan [is/was] a [brilliant coach/the Messiah/a c**t/described in this TWTD link/useless/the reason Adams failed/the only good thing about the club] and his departure means we're [doomed/saved/a bunch of c**ts/well-described in this TWTD link/going to see how our new manager works with his chosen team]. Wrothers who [praised/scorned/were indifferent towards/see this TWTD link/are c**ts towards] him and are now [sticking to what they though/changing their minds/acting as described here on TWTD/utter c**ts] are [c**ts].

Is that roughly it? Is it safe to come back on yet?

Me, I think Phelan was intended as Royle Mark Two, it didn't work, and the new manager wants his own man, so all have behaved reasonably; Phelan will doubtless get a good coaching role elsewhere as he's very good. But that's bound to be the minority view.

Posted By: Old Man on January 20th 2015 at 16:24:00

Message Thread

Not going to read down the board. Does this cover what I'm missing? (NCFC) - Old Man, Jan 20, 16:24:00
- A reasonable summary and I agree with your view of it all! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Jan 20, 16:58:12
- Multi-headed troll boy not been on so no TWATD links as yet... (NCFC) - Pixelman, Jan 20, 16:30:49
  - He been on...... (NCFC) - CB41, Jan 20, 16:38:50
    - if you really think (NCFC) - robotbear, Jan 20, 19:53:18
      - Cock (NCFC) - yellowman, Jan 20, 20:22:21
    - ah... me bad. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pixelman, Jan 20, 16:42:07

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.