in fairness everyone is saying that, but it all changed as Bennett got injured, he initial
change may have been O'Neill for Hooper, we just don't know.
Posted By: lovely old job on January 10th 2015 at 18:07:55
Message Thread
- It was very smart to move Cameron wide when down to 10 (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 10, 18:01:24
- I thought he was going to get sent off as well. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 10, 18:02:33
- Sounded like he was trying to for a while (n/m) (NCFC) - woody, Jan 10, 18:12:17
- Looking to keep 2 strikers on the pitch when down to 10... Hoots wouldn't have (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Jan 10, 18:05:21
- in fairness everyone is saying that, but it all changed as Bennett got injured, he initial (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 10, 18:07:55
- Yes, unlikely his plan would've been Tettey as right back & Jerome left wing! (n/m) (NCFC) - woody, Jan 10, 18:11:37
- in fairness everyone is saying that, but it all changed as Bennett got injured, he initial (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 10, 18:07:55
- Yh I agree, hooper sounded burnt out so made sence to sit up top on his own holding it up (n/m) (NCFC) - hoolahan, Jan 10, 18:02:12
- I thought he was going to get sent off as well. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, Jan 10, 18:02:33
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.