So do you think we've gone for the cheap option then?
Posted By: Trent_Canary on January 7th 2015 at 14:52:15
Message Thread
- YES! At least it is an interesting appointment, one that looks like some thought has gone (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 7, 14:47:15
- How is it not a cheap option? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 7, 14:49:32
- because we'll have to pay some compensation for him (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 7, 14:50:00
- A bit I suppose but won't be a huge salary (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 7, 14:50:55
- wroth Fact (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Jan 7, 15:13:42
- So do you think we've gone for the cheap option then? (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Jan 7, 14:52:15
- No a cheap option (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 7, 14:53:56
- A bit I suppose but won't be a huge salary (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 7, 14:50:55
- because we'll have to pay some compensation for him (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 7, 14:50:00
- How is it not a cheap option? (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Jan 7, 14:49:32
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.