Hughton was an obvious (for us) and cheap option - Wrath of the Barclay

Hughton was an obvious (for us) and cheap option

but the very wrong option as he was very different from how Lambert had the club set up.

Posted By: Brandonio on January 6th 2015 at 22:14:48

Message Thread

we all know it will be the cheap option (NCFC) - yellows2011, Jan 6, 21:34:34
- Were Lambert and Hughton cheap then? Are they the same old appointments? (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 6, 21:43:18
  - (Bucks?) (n/m) (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 6, 21:56:53
    - No chance (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 6, 22:02:01
      - Oh, OK. (NCFC) - Arizona Bay, Jan 6, 22:02:56
        
        Yeah. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 6, 22:04:29
        
        blimey, I got that one wrong then (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 6, 22:09:15
    - I suspect so (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Jan 6, 22:01:19
  - lambert was great but the hughton appointment was cheap and we could have done so much (NCFC) - yellows2011, Jan 6, 21:56:10
    - Hughton was an obvious (for us) and cheap option (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 6, 22:14:48
      - *wasn't a cheap option (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Jan 6, 22:15:09
    - Rubbish. (NCFC) - Yellalee, Jan 6, 22:03:09
    - I would have thought Hughton was more expensive than Lambert. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, Jan 6, 22:00:55
- Not sure. I assume neither Lambert or Hughton (NCFC) - Mozzer, Jan 6, 21:42:54

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.