The Telegraph reported at the time that he was 'expected to sign a 1 year contract' - Wrath of the Barclay

The Telegraph reported at the time that he was 'expected to sign a 1 year contract'

Posted By: Trent_Canary on January 6th 2015 at 11:53:37

Message Thread

Lennon is 6 months into a 3 yr deal, having been rejected by or rejected us (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 6, 11:47:23
- Bolton are ?163.8m in debt, we'll have to pay for him, but they can't turn good money down (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Jan 6, 12:01:29
  - But it's pretty much all owed to one bloke who's never going to ask for it back (n/m) (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 6, 12:14:53
    - We're Phucked then, old son. 4 centre mids in midfield and Anderson on loan (n/m) (NCFC) - MIKEWALKER, Jan 6, 12:55:35
- Not according to reports at the time. (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 6, 11:50:27
  - The Telegraph reported at the time that he was 'expected to sign a 1 year contract' (n/m) (NCFC) - Trent_Canary, Jan 6, 11:53:37
- 1 year deal according to someone on here... (n/m) (NCFC) - Adster, Jan 6, 11:48:01
  - Three Years (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Jan 6, 11:52:50
    - It doesn't give a contract length anywhere on the Bolton official site! (n/m) (NCFC) - Kirrie, Jan 6, 12:03:28
    - My fear exactly (n/m) (NCFC) - admckechnie, Jan 6, 11:58:36

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.