Why did we stick with 4-3-3 yesterday?
when it was obvious after 10 minutes that we were outnumbered in midfield. Hucks was totally out of sorts (again) and should have gone off and been replaced by another midfielder.
Posted By: bartman on January 3rd 2006 at 11:32:40
Message Thread
- Why did we stick with 4-3-3 yesterday? (NCFC) - bartman, Jan 3, 11:32:40
- do you think he might have been out of sorts (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 3, 11:36:06
- Yes and whats the betting that after one ordinary game (NCFC) - bartman, Jan 3, 11:40:21
- what do you mean, "another" midfielder? (NCFC) - mr carra, Jan 3, 11:34:57
- 4-3-3 has worked previous matches. (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Jan 3, 11:34:26
- I didn't have any complaints with the 4-3-3 (NCFC) - Tweedy, Jan 3, 11:37:53
- dont you all forget we dont have a right midfielder at the club (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 3, 11:39:01
- Yes but we've had Saf in previous matches (NCFC) - bartman, Jan 3, 11:36:53
- I didn't have any complaints with the 4-3-3 (NCFC) - Tweedy, Jan 3, 11:37:53
- do you think he might have been out of sorts (NCFC) - camcan, Jan 3, 11:36:06
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.