Charlton was better than quite a few of the City players ......
which says alot about the rest of the team.
Flemking and Doc played well
Posted By: oh arr on January 3rd 2006 at 02:56:16
Message Thread
- No surprise.... (NCFC) - mark bowen, Jan 2, 20:13:09
- Charlton was better than quite a few of the City players ...... (NCFC) - oh arr, Jan 3, 02:56:16
- Charlton hasn't been doing too badly (NCFC) - Poirot, Jan 2, 20:19:27
- Wothless wouldn't know a good midfielder if he saw one (n/m) (NCFC) - green tambourine, Jan 2, 20:15:14
- Safri? (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 2, 20:15:53
- But preferred Holt (n/m) (NCFC) - green tambourine, Jan 2, 20:17:16
- But signed him none-the-less (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 2, 20:19:59
- and for only ?500,000! (NCFC) - Poirot, Jan 2, 20:22:20
- plus the ?500k add on = ?1m (n/m) (NCFC) - oh arr, Jan 3, 02:56:43
- Safri was a great signing. (n/m) (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Jan 2, 20:43:56
- hes right midfield but 100,000 glenn little to reading - bargain (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Jan 2, 20:25:25
- Glen Little is quality (NCFC) - Poirot, Jan 2, 20:33:17
- and for only ?500,000! (NCFC) - Poirot, Jan 2, 20:22:20
- But signed him none-the-less (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 2, 20:19:59
- But preferred Holt (n/m) (NCFC) - green tambourine, Jan 2, 20:17:16
- Safri? (NCFC) - Brom, Jan 2, 20:15:53
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.