ignoring the translation minefield

(Dutch > French > English (via Archant subs)) then NO-ONE, not one solitary happy-clapper-Hughton-inner who watched NCFC last season would think that we had played good football.

The person who was in charge has been sacked so why, WHY, are people still looking to stick it to players who struggled under his system?

rant over

Posted By: Henclrikus on November 18th 2014 at 15:16:50

Message Thread

"the team did not practice good football" (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 18, 14:38:43
- ignoring the translation minefield (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Nov 18, 15:16:50
  - Just thought it was a strange comment from someone who contributed so much it being poor. (n/m) (NCFC) - lurd, Nov 18, 15:26:49
    - ponderous build-up play (NCFC) - Henclrikus, Nov 18, 15:33:54
      - agreed, but that still doesn't exclude air shots from a few yards out (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Nov 18, 15:42:42
        
        *excuse* (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, Nov 18, 15:44:57
      - no, but scoring 4 fewer goals than anyone else in the league usually is (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 18, 15:37:04
        
        Hughton's ambition free side didn't try very hard to score goals. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Nov 18, 15:41:47
  - becasue RVW was shit regardless of the system we played (n/m) (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 18, 15:23:50
  - Because he was shit? (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Git, Nov 18, 15:23:25
- it's only natural that he'd try to deflect criticism from himself (NCFC) - Worzel Scrimmage, Nov 18, 15:03:59
- Was the first thing I thought when I read it (n/m) (NCFC) - pants, Nov 18, 15:00:59
  - Contrast to Becchio. Frozen out the team whilst rvw played most games (NCFC) - pants, Nov 18, 15:03:01

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.