They were poor.
They had physical presence, but other than that, they didn't offer much.
I thought we played well for 70 minutes of the game, and really didn't need to switch up a gear, the way we were playing a 3rd goal could have come at any time but instead.... we conceded a goal, and didn't look like scoring a goal without Deano.
Posted By: Squiggles on December 28th 2005 at 23:17:41
Message Thread
- Great for 70 minutes... (NCFC) - Squiggles, Dec 28, 23:10:34
- Burnley 5th before tonight???Whats that all about?! (n/m) (NCFC) - conker, Dec 28, 23:11:16
- They were poor. (NCFC) - Squiggles, Dec 28, 23:17:41
- won 5 on the bounce before tonights game n.m (n/m) (NCFC) - ingi, Dec 28, 23:13:07
- Don't know. Thought they looked rather poor. Should be mid table at best. (n/m) (NCFC) - PaulMcVeighGirl, Dec 28, 23:12:54
- Burnley 5th before tonight???Whats that all about?! (n/m) (NCFC) - conker, Dec 28, 23:11:16
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.