I don't think Rotherham were ultra negative. They actually got

In behind our slow, disorganised defence on 3 or 4 occasions with worrying ease. They were much more positive than Charlton.

But I agree re the 4-2-3-1. At present we are trying to accommodate Wes and Grabban because Adams doesn't feel he can drop either and feels under pressure to play 2 strikers to be seen to be "attacking". You can actually play Grabban as one of the 3 in the 4-2-3-1 though if want to keep him in the side.

Oh and drop Hoiveld, bring back Tettey and for gods sake give VOO a chance for a few minutes in a game in his proper position.

Posted By: Jim on October 5th 2014 at 07:35:00

Message Thread

Think i'd go 4 2 3 1 amd drop Grabban on yesterdays performance, though we have to accept (NCFC) - protheroe fitzgibbon, Oct 5, 07:25:32
- We need hooper to get a, fit and b, motivated (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Oct 5, 08:06:33
- 21 goals so far, and the division leading scores, no need to change anything (n/m) (NCFC) - bartender100, Oct 5, 08:05:43
- I don't think Rotherham were ultra negative. They actually got (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 5, 07:35:00
  - Johnno never seems to sit on the bench which is mystifying (n/m) (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Oct 5, 08:07:45
    - Or get subbed. I like him, seems a good lad but his (NCFC) - Jim, Oct 5, 08:10:35

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.