History will show that Fotheringham cost nothing, had some decent games, but left under a
cloud under Gunn and wasn't that great for other clubs afterwards
History will also show that RVW cost ?9m and probably about ?35k a week at least, but did nothing, and could turn out to be the biggest net loss in the clubs history
I know which one will be mocked the most
Posted By: pants on August 27th 2014 at 11:39:04
Message Thread
- hahahahahah - seriously, Mark Fotheringham started for Fulham last night... (n/m) (Other Football) - owjd, Aug 27, 11:17:14
- History will show that Fotheringham cost nothing, had some decent games, but left under a (Other Football) - pants, Aug 27, 11:39:04
- They're both universally mocked by us, whether fairly or not. (Other Football) - APB, Aug 27, 11:43:26
- No he didn't. (Other Football) - Yellalee, Aug 27, 11:34:43
- And they won! (n/m) (Other Football) - SCC 28, Aug 27, 11:18:24
- History will show that Fotheringham cost nothing, had some decent games, but left under a (Other Football) - pants, Aug 27, 11:39:04
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.