agreed but that formation was nuts

in diamond with 2 actual strikers both are good

Bennett, Redmond, murphy not enough for me

and if either of those sides edge us out could cost us 100 times what they paid

Posted By: matgore on August 16th 2014 at 20:13:17

Message Thread

Surman to Bournemouth according to sky (n/m) (NCFC) - glasgow, Aug 16, 19:59:09
- Good he's a lightweight (n/m) (NCFC) - Larry Hagman, Aug 16, 20:05:58
- Silly move for us. Strengthen a play off rival. (NCFC) - Tony Martin, Aug 16, 20:01:13
  - Disagree, genuinely dont think he's all that (n/m) (NCFC) - Taxi 4 Johnson, Aug 16, 20:13:36
  - would make no sense at all (NCFC) - matgore, Aug 16, 20:06:07
    - Surman & Pilks (NCFC) - Jack Flash, Aug 16, 20:09:41
      - Pilks 'fair to middling' and would 'always be fringe'? (NCFC) - Tricky Hawes, Aug 16, 20:15:17
      - agreed but that formation was nuts (NCFC) - matgore, Aug 16, 20:13:17
    - these are the teams who are buying.......... (NCFC) - usacanary, Aug 16, 20:08:27

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.