Worries me the emphasis on giving our youngster a chance
I would probably say one probable & 3 possibles of the current under 21s. Haven't seen much of the current under 18s but only a couple of possibles in what I've seen. Hope I'm wrong
Posted By: trt354 on May 25th 2014 at 13:29:41
Message Thread
- Just looked up our youth results, not quite what I expected (NCFC) - phrankin, May 25, 13:14:21
- Much smaller squad that most other teams (NCFC) - trt354, May 25, 13:22:51
- Worries me the emphasis on giving our youngster a chance (NCFC) - trt354, May 25, 13:29:41
- That worries me as well... Josh Murphy looks Raw and he is rated as the best. (NCFC) - phrankin, May 25, 13:35:01
- I was hoping there would be some caveats (NCFC) - phrankin, May 25, 13:24:23
- Worries me the emphasis on giving our youngster a chance (NCFC) - trt354, May 25, 13:29:41
- That's encouraging... (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, May 25, 13:19:24
- Yep - the Youth team considerably outperforming the senior teams performance. I agree. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 25, 13:24:56
- . (n/m) (NCFC) - avenging canary, May 25, 13:34:48
- but did they play (losing often) in the Norwich way? (n/m) (NCFC) - bobble, May 25, 13:21:22
- All we need is a few starlets in there. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 25, 13:22:58
- Yep - the Youth team considerably outperforming the senior teams performance. I agree. (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 25, 13:24:56
- Much smaller squad that most other teams (NCFC) - trt354, May 25, 13:22:51
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.