I don't think appointing Adams was an exercise in cost-cutting.
The amount of money saved would be negligible in the scheme of things. It would be like hocking yourself up to the eyeballs to buy a Bentley, but not having metallic paint to save a few quid. It was just a stupid appointment. Unbelievably stupid.
Posted By: avenging canary on May 24th 2014 at 08:17:19
Message Thread
- I don't think appointing Adams was an exercise in cost-cutting. (NCFC) - avenging canary, May 24, 08:17:19
- why are you so sure he is not going to be a success? (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, May 24, 08:38:42
- No experience, no track record, egotistical under performing players many of whom (NCFC) - avenging canary, May 24, 08:48:00
- as opposed to Hughton who had a good record and experience. (NCFC) - thirsty work, May 24, 08:56:30
- Rioch walked but was doing ok (NCFC) - avenging canary, May 24, 09:52:00
- as opposed to Hughton who had a good record and experience. (NCFC) - thirsty work, May 24, 08:56:30
- No experience, no track record, egotistical under performing players many of whom (NCFC) - avenging canary, May 24, 08:48:00
- They paid out to Birmingham for their coaching staff (NCFC) - Hit Squadie, May 24, 08:22:25
- why are you so sure he is not going to be a success? (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, May 24, 08:38:42
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.