not really stupid, if 1st keeper injured in 1st match, 2nd keeper sent off in 2nd, you'd
have no 3rd choice keeper to put on then you'd have to put in an outfield player, although I think this scenario happened and they were allowed to bring in another goal
Posted By: DickyVonStinkhorn on May 12th 2014 at 15:51:02
Message Thread
- Why take 3 keepers anyway??? (n/m) (Other Football) - admckechnie, May 12, 13:06:44
- Fair enough. Stupid if by choice (n/m) (Other Football) - admckechnie, May 12, 13:09:59
- not really stupid, if 1st keeper injured in 1st match, 2nd keeper sent off in 2nd, you'd (Other Football) - DickyVonStinkhorn, May 12, 15:51:02
- goalie (damn you auto correct) (n/m) (Other Football) - DickyVonStinkhorn, May 12, 15:52:22
- not really stupid, if 1st keeper injured in 1st match, 2nd keeper sent off in 2nd, you'd (Other Football) - DickyVonStinkhorn, May 12, 15:51:02
- Rules state that you have to take 3 (n/m) (Other Football) - Darren Eadie, May 12, 13:08:00
- do they? Didn't realise that. (n/m) (Other Football) - Tricky Hawes, May 12, 14:05:35
- Fair enough. Stupid if by choice (n/m) (Other Football) - admckechnie, May 12, 13:09:59
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.