Man Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal

were/are all absolutely there for the taking. Couldn't have asked for a better time to play them, and yet we've just sat back offering almost no attacking threat in two and a half games , letting them control the play.

Posted By: Mecagoenti on May 11th 2014 at 15:43:46

Message Thread

I take it everybody has seen (NCFC) - dublinspants, May 11, 15:38:45
- No. Settling for a point against Chelsea was a managerial masterstrike (NCFC) - phrankin, May 11, 15:40:46
  - Man Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 11, 15:43:46
    - Something we've done all season even against far worse teams than those (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, May 11, 15:47:49
      - stop trolling (n/m) (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 11, 15:51:41
        
        Eh? (NCFC) - BerlinCanary, May 11, 15:52:50
        
        no i'm not - the point was that it was a good time to play them (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 11, 16:00:22
    - Chelsea I think he did everything right... 0-0, 10 minutes to go (NCFC) - phrankin, May 11, 15:45:41
      - You are right. Assuming Sunderland would lose their last two was optimistic at the best (n/m) (NCFC) - South_West_Canary, May 11, 15:47:57
  - Yeah cause hughton was fantastic in the previous thirty games - pillock. (n/m) (NCFC) - Men without hats, May 11, 15:42:26
    - So why does that excuse the new guy? (NCFC) - phrankin, May 11, 15:44:35

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.