I think Hoot and Roeder were good choices...
Roeder had a history of getting teams out of trouble (and then putting them back in trouble a year later.) To keep us up, he was a good choice.
Hoot had done well at Newcastle and Birmingham.
Posted By: phrankin on May 7th 2014 at 22:07:47
Message Thread
- loving the optimism, but our Board scare me. (NCFC) - bobble, May 7, 22:00:35
- It's frightening that it's in their hands. (NCFC) - Pink un exile, May 7, 22:20:51
- This board have only.really appointed Lambo and Hoots, haven't they? (NCFC) - Garry Brooke, May 7, 22:17:11
- if we hadn't appointed Gunn we wouldn't have got Lambert (NCFC) - trt354, May 7, 22:16:08
- I think Hoot and Roeder were good choices... (NCFC) - phrankin, May 7, 22:07:47
- Controversial, but it don't think Hughton was a bad decision... (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 7, 22:05:27
- Not many did at the time. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, May 7, 22:10:00
- Indeed not (n/m) (NCFC) - Yellalee, May 7, 22:10:15
- Not many did at the time. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, May 7, 22:10:00
- same concerns here. (n/m) (NCFC) - lovely old job, May 7, 22:01:35
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.