All this slagging off of McNally....
My understanding of things was there was a vote on whether to keep Hughton at least once earlier in the season and it was a tied vote (3-3) due to the absence of one of the directors. Do we really think, given his comments about Hughton over the course of the season, and his history in football, McNally was one of the three who voted to keep him?
The blame lays elsewhere in my opinion.
Posted By: avid_canary on May 7th 2014 at 20:38:17
Message Thread
- All this slagging off of McNally.... (NCFC) - avid_canary, May 7, 20:38:17
- I'm with you. (NCFC) - Pink un exile, May 7, 20:43:27
- Couldn't the absent director haveof texted his vote? (n/m) (NCFC) - Huge Small, May 7, 20:41:54
- As posted below (NCFC) - Chicken, May 7, 20:40:27
- I,was of the belief that fry was very much an honorary director. (NCFC) - Pink un exile, May 7, 20:46:29
- why do we let cooks and TV personalities have a say (n/m) (NCFC) - Only1Doherty, May 7, 20:39:12
- Agreed. (n/m) (NCFC) - whoareya1, May 7, 20:39:05
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.