I agree with the Elmander substitution yesterday
It gave the Chelsea defenders something different to think about as Elmander was never going to create anything up top on his own in a game like that.
The perceived slack Adams is getting compared to Hughton can be summed up in one game - West Ham away. Hughton showed his classic 'play for a point' stance and it cost us a game we should have won. The subs yesterday had a positive effect on our performance and increased our chances of nicking the three points on the break.
The only thing I would have done differently was to put Bennett on in the last ten so we had another player with pace up top, but I understand why he didn't get a chance with his long injury.
Back to lurking.
Posted By: Dahab_Canary on May 5th 2014 at 10:33:07
Message Thread
- I agree with the Elmander substitution yesterday (NCFC) - Dahab_Canary, May 5, 10:33:07
- Adams tactics were spot on until the last 10... (NCFC) - phrankin, May 5, 10:46:25
- If his injury was still a problem he shouldn't have been on the bench. (n/m) (NCFC) - Ben, May 5, 10:36:46
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.