They didn't really 'pick us off' in that game
Tettey just made a total f*** up. Trouble yesterday was a draw was pretty much as bad as a loss staying up wise (though better for our 'dignity' maybe) - if increasing our chance of winning by 30% meant increasing our chance of losing by say 75% that was still a chance we had to take. We basically admitted yesterday we'd accepted we were going down
Posted By: mr carra on May 5th 2014 at 07:52:03
Message Thread
- Regarding the game and tactics yesterday: (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 07:01:10
- Same happened at Arsenal (n/m) (NCFC) - duke of york, May 5, 09:44:14
- They didn't really 'pick us off' in that game (NCFC) - mr carra, May 5, 07:52:03
- Increasing the chance of losing surely means decreasing the chance of winning? (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 08:02:17
- No, because there is another option (NCFC) - mr carra, May 5, 08:07:08
- Yes, but by making the draw less likely you're also making us winning less likely. (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 08:10:00
- I take it maths isn't your speciality? (NCFC) - mr carra, May 5, 08:15:29
- Ok, no need to be insulting. (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 08:17:43
- not necessarily (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 5, 08:12:04
- Well, I'm not into stats much. (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 08:14:46
- just accept relegation then. (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 5, 09:51:51
- Well, I'm not into stats much (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, May 5, 08:34:24
- Well, I'm not into stats much. (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 08:14:46
- I take it maths isn't your speciality? (NCFC) - mr carra, May 5, 08:15:29
- Yes, but by making the draw less likely you're also making us winning less likely. (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 08:10:00
- Board violation ^^^^^ logic and reasoning are not permitted on the Wroth. (n/m) (NCFC) - mike_the_sphinx, May 5, 08:06:06
- No, because there is another option (NCFC) - mr carra, May 5, 08:07:08
- Increasing the chance of losing surely means decreasing the chance of winning? (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 08:02:17
- I'd have thrown Hooper on towards the end (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 5, 07:17:57
- We were putting them under pressure, a bit. (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 07:43:59
- Bennett was booked for time-wasting, which was harsh. (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 07:42:23
- My view (NCFC) - Tony Martin, May 5, 07:07:08
- If players had taken chances this season we'd be hailing Hughton as a tactical genius (NCFC) - mr carra, May 5, 07:54:44
- but sunderland did beat them! and they are meant to be as shit as us (n/m) (NCFC) - selwyn, May 5, 07:44:59
- They got an iffy penalty (NCFC) - trt354, May 5, 09:59:17
- By employing the exact same tactics (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, May 5, 07:50:56
- not exactly the same (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 5, 07:56:33
- I think Olsson was intended as an attacking player. (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 08:04:15
- not exactly the same (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 5, 07:56:33
- ... and using his (Mourinho's) tactics as well. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 07:08:18
- That's what I meant by frustrating them with their own gameplan (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, May 5, 07:10:11
- Yes. Trying to do several things at once. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 07:10:54
- Me, that is. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 07:14:42
- Yes. Trying to do several things at once. (n/m) (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 07:10:54
- That's what I meant by frustrating them with their own gameplan (n/m) (NCFC) - Tony Martin, May 5, 07:10:11
- ... (NCFC) - APB, May 5, 07:07:07
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.