no they didn't - unless you are blaming him for three of the goals - Wrath of the Barclay

no they didn't - unless you are blaming him for three of the goals

which would be ridiculous

Posted By: Mecagoenti on May 4th 2014 at 15:53:56

Message Thread

If we had beaten baggies at home we'd be 2 points ahead.. (NCFC) - loz, May 4, 15:22:47
- We didn't though and for everyone of our ifs other teams will have (NCFC) - lovely old job, May 4, 15:32:48
- That's what's so frustrating... (NCFC) - Sanity, May 4, 15:26:22
  - Don't forget Bassong giving Stoke a point at home... (n/m) (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, May 4, 15:33:27
    - he just makes the odd very visible error due to poor concentration (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 4, 15:36:33
      - But his visible mistakes cost us time and again... (n/m) (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, May 4, 15:39:05
        
        they don't - they've cost us about 3 or 4 goals this season (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 4, 15:41:29
        
        They cost us 3 in the Villa game alone... (n/m) (NCFC) - Vivid Data Shark, May 4, 15:43:44
        
        no they didn't - unless you are blaming him for three of the goals (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, May 4, 15:53:56
        
        He did have a nightmare 30 minutes. But still. (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 15:55:58
        
        That said, he is still a better option to R Bennett or Martin (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, May 4, 15:50:34
  - the table don't lie (n/m) (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, May 4, 15:29:07
- Super chris. (n/m) (NCFC) - Pink un exile, May 4, 15:23:21

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.