Yeah I agree, but a lot of the first round of cash got ate up

paying off debt so I think that was a bit deceptive. My axe to grind was they had to sack or back, back in December. Doing neither was an abomination, therefore their grade of D.

Posted By: SeattleSounders on May 3rd 2014 at 17:58:56

Message Thread

I'm just waiting for the return of prudence with ambition. (NCFC) - Pink un exile, May 3, 17:44:55
- I'm angry with the Board but grading them fairly, (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, May 3, 17:49:52
  - I've always believed the two are intertwined. (NCFC) - Pink un exile, May 3, 17:54:30
    - Yeah I agree, but a lot of the first round of cash got ate up (NCFC) - SeattleSounders, May 3, 17:58:56
      - Yes. They should have backed him if they believed in him. (NCFC) - Pink un exile, May 3, 18:03:25
        
        they were complacent (NCFC) - pab, May 3, 18:33:31
  - How can they be a D when they started from a position of....... (NCFC) - usacanary, May 3, 17:54:28

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.