Wimbledon docked 3 points for fielding ineligible ...
Player surely Sunderland should have been treated the same?
Posted By: loz on April 28th 2014 at 13:14:26
Message Thread
- Wimbledon docked 3 points for fielding ineligible ... (NCFC) - loz, Apr 28, 13:14:26
- Can anybody explain the difference between the two cases? (n/m) (NCFC) - trustsec, Apr 28, 14:55:05
- Wimbledon won a game with the ineligible player (NCFC) - ruudyforcity, Apr 28, 16:35:24
- we should be building a legal case based on that (n/m) (NCFC) - Upperjarroldmiddle, Apr 28, 13:15:45
- you're right there (n/m) (NCFC) - ingi, Apr 28, 13:19:34
- we should but guess now McNasty is McPussy we won't bother fighting. (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 28, 13:24:41
- We might but... (NCFC) - Norfolk un Way, Apr 28, 13:52:52
- we should but guess now McNasty is McPussy we won't bother fighting. (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Apr 28, 13:24:41
- you're right there (n/m) (NCFC) - ingi, Apr 28, 13:19:34
- Can anybody explain the difference between the two cases? (n/m) (NCFC) - trustsec, Apr 28, 14:55:05
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.