agreed
Hooper perhaps slightly better holding the ball up, RvW better off the ball.
Against Vidic and Ferdinand, I guess that Adams sees the extra pace of RvW as being important.
Posted By: Mecagoenti on April 26th 2014 at 17:01:06
Message Thread
- Surprised at the negativity about the line up... (NCFC) - Sanity, Apr 26, 16:54:33
- You do realise we've lost the last two games right? (n/m) (NCFC) - Mickdundee, Apr 26, 17:19:57
- Well (NCFC) - Winged Eel Creosote, Apr 26, 17:06:23
- me too. all players bar hooper look better without hoot (n/m) (NCFC) - fal5taff, Apr 26, 17:02:45
- Even though he scored, Hooper had a poor game last week (NCFC) - ede, Apr 26, 16:59:13
- apart from the little fact that Hooper CAN actually hit the back of the net (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Apr 26, 17:07:08
- agreed (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 26, 17:01:06
- I'd rather have seen Tettey for Johnson (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Apr 26, 16:58:05
- ^^^all of this^^^ (n/m) (NCFC) - Old Man, Apr 26, 17:02:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.