For all RvW's good work... Hooper cleverly winning a free kick centrally

was more threatening than anything RvE did.

Posted By: phrankin on March 23rd 2014 at 09:59:35

Message Thread

I didn't realise at the time how bad Ricky's miss was in the first (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 23, 08:39:59
- He does ok now, a workhorse, but offers nothing of note in and around the box... (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 23, 09:19:35
- Terrible (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 23, 08:41:08
  - Had another good game otherwise getting there I think... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 23, 08:41:56
    - Disappointing, but I don't think either chance was a "sitter" (n/m) (NCFC) - derbyshire canary, Mar 23, 09:16:11
      - how easy a chance does he need?! Open goal? (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 23, 09:58:46
        
        he'd still miss the ball (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 23, 10:08:46
    - getting there? (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 23, 08:45:04
      - I don't think so with Elmander looks encouraging... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 23, 09:36:16
        
        For all RvW's good work... Hooper cleverly winning a free kick centrally (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 23, 09:59:35
      - has hoots tried every combination between elmander, rvw and hooper? (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 23, 08:52:50
        
        They've done well together... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 23, 09:37:44
        
        yep, we look better going forward with Elmander (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 23, 09:53:06
        
        We need 2 up front for Elmander too look ok. (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 23, 10:00:37
      - Hooper offers a lot less at the moment. (n/m) (NCFC) - bird table, Mar 23, 08:51:41
        
        Tend to agree (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 23, 09:50:02
        
        are you ok? (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 23, 09:19:51
        
        you're joking surely!!!! (NCFC) - Cheltenham_Canary, Mar 23, 08:55:20
        
        Oh yes (NCFC) - Ghost Ship Belly, Mar 23, 09:58:54
        
        RvW has more energy, closes down more, works harder (NCFC) - duke of york, Mar 23, 08:54:51
        
        vmt (NCFC) - Mecagoenti, Mar 23, 09:25:43
        
        He's called Lukaku and costs 20m+... (NCFC) - Yellalee, Mar 23, 08:58:28
        
        he offers a record of some decent finishes for norwich city (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 23, 08:54:34
        
        Wolf had a very good game miss... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 23, 09:33:24
        
        lol he's gone around 20 hours without scoring (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 23, 09:38:49
        
        Plenty of strikers have been out of form... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 23, 09:47:33
        
        soldado an even bigger flop probably (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 23, 09:50:12
        
        Top player adjusting to the league (n/m) (NCFC) - loz, Mar 23, 09:51:19
        
        ROLF (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 23, 09:51:53
        
        So soldado isn't a top player? (NCFC) - loz, Mar 23, 09:55:18
        
        he's shite (n/m) (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 23, 09:59:03
        
        and Benteke has 9 goals this season... not outstanding, but also not 1 (n/m) (NCFC) - phrankin, Mar 23, 10:05:53
        
        yep similar to holt last season (NCFC) - SCC 28, Mar 23, 10:07:51
        
        funny how we judge players differently. Hooper everytime for me (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 23, 09:34:32
        
        Very good striker but even he hasn't scored this year... (NCFC) - loz, Mar 23, 09:48:34
        
        Ricky doesnt even make the keeper work (n/m) (NCFC) - thirsty work, Mar 23, 09:59:34

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.